SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 17775

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
FAIZ – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/47820/2022



An accused can be granted bail even in serious offenses like POCSO Act cases if there are material contradictions in the victim's statements and the medical examination report does not provide a definite opinion about sexual assault.

Headnote:

BAIL - POCSO ACT - SECTION 3/4 - BAIL GRANTED - MATERIAL CONTRADICTIONS IN VICTIM'S STATEMENTS - NO DEFINITE OPINION ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT IN MEDICAL EXAMINATION REPORT - APPLICANT LANGUISHING IN JAIL SINCE 14.05.2022 - NO CRIMINAL HISTORY

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested and charged under Sections 363, 376 IPC, and 3/4 POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl. The applicant filed a bail application, arguing that there were material contradictions between the victim's statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and 164 CrPC, and that the medical examination report did not provide a definite opinion about sexual assault. The applicant also claimed to have no criminal history and had been in jail since 14.05.2022.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there were material contradictions between the victim's statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and 164 CrPC, and that the medical examination report did not provide a definite opinion about sexual assault. The court also noted that the applicant had no criminal history and had been in jail since 14.05.2022.

Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the material contradictions in the victim's statements and the lack of a definite opinion about sexual assault in the medical examination report.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant had made out a case for bail considering the material contradictions in the victim's statements, the lack of a definite opinion about sexual assault in the medical examination report, the applicant's lack of criminal history, and the time spent in jail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail subject to certain conditions.

Court No. - 79

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47820

of 2022

Applicant :- Faiz

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Gupta

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Srivastava

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar

Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned

A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case. He further submits that there are material

contradictions between the statements of the victim recorded

under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. He further submits

that in her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. victim

has stated that she was having love with the applicant whereas

in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she resile

from her previous version. He further submits that she was

medically examined and as per medical examination report, no

definite opinion about sexual assault can be given. It has also

been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to

cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make

himself available before the court whenever required and is also

ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit

to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is

languishing in jail since 14.05.2022 having no criminal history.

3. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,

submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of

evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case,

without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court

is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

Hence the bail application is allowed.

5. Let applicant Faiz involved in Case Crime No. 189 of 2022,

under Sections 363, 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police

Station Bilaspur, District Rampur, be released on bail on

furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of

the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned

subject to the following conditions:-

A. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the

trial.

B. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution

witness.

C. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date

fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

D. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the

offence of which he is an accused, or suspected, of the

commission of he is suspected.

E. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such

facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the

evidence.

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court

shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in

accordance with law.

Order Date :- 4.1.2023

AKT

Digitally signed by :-

ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top