ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
FAIZ – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/47820/2022
BAIL - POCSO ACT - SECTION 3/4 - BAIL GRANTED - MATERIAL CONTRADICTIONS IN VICTIM'S STATEMENTS - NO DEFINITE OPINION ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT IN MEDICAL EXAMINATION REPORT - APPLICANT LANGUISHING IN JAIL SINCE 14.05.2022 - NO CRIMINAL HISTORY
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested and charged under Sections 363, 376 IPC, and 3/4 POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl. The applicant filed a bail application, arguing that there were material contradictions between the victim's statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and 164 CrPC, and that the medical examination report did not provide a definite opinion about sexual assault. The applicant also claimed to have no criminal history and had been in jail since 14.05.2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there were material contradictions between the victim's statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and 164 CrPC, and that the medical examination report did not provide a definite opinion about sexual assault. The court also noted that the applicant had no criminal history and had been in jail since 14.05.2022.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the material contradictions in the victim's statements and the lack of a definite opinion about sexual assault in the medical examination report.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant had made out a case for bail considering the material contradictions in the victim's statements, the lack of a definite opinion about sexual assault in the medical examination report, the applicant's lack of criminal history, and the time spent in jail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail subject to certain conditions.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47820
of 2022
Applicant :- Faiz
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar
Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned
A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the
present case. He further submits that there are material
contradictions between the statements of the victim recorded
under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. He further submits
that in her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. victim
has stated that she was having love with the applicant whereas
in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she resile
from her previous version. He further submits that she was
medically examined and as per medical examination report, no
definite opinion about sexual assault can be given. It has also
been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to
cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make
himself available before the court whenever required and is also
ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit
to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is
languishing in jail since 14.05.2022 having no criminal history.
3. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of
evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case,
without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court
is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Hence the bail application is allowed.
5. Let applicant Faiz involved in Case Crime No. 189 of 2022,
under Sections 363, 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police
Station Bilaspur, District Rampur, be released on bail on
furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of
the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned
subject to the following conditions:-
A. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the
trial.
B. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution
witness.
C. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date
fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
D. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the
offence of which he is an accused, or suspected, of the
commission of he is suspected.
E. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the
evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court
shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in
accordance with law.
Order Date :- 4.1.2023
AKT
Digitally signed by :-
ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.