SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 1176

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAMIT GOPAL
RINKU URF ANUJ – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 69

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1824 of 2023

Applicant :- Rinku Urf Anuj

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Uttam Kumar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

Sri Parmeshwar Yadav, learned Advocate, has filed

his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2

today in Court, which is taken on record.

List revised.

Heard Sri Uttam Kumar, learned counsel for the

applicant, Sri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for

the State, Sri Parmeshwar Yadav, learned counsel

for opposite party no. 2 and perused the record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been

filed by the applicant with the prayer to allow this

application and quash the charge-sheet dated

11.5.2017, cognizance order dated 29.5.2017 and

entire proceedings of Special Trial No. 32 of 2017,

arising out of Case Crime No. 0122 of 2017, under

Sections 363, 366, 507 IPC and 8 POCSO Act,

Police Station Thathiya, District Kannauj and with

further prayer that further proceedings of the

aforesaid case, charge-sheet and cognizance order

be stayed during the pendency of the present

application.

Learned counsel for the applicant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top