2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2359
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMAKANT YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/52529/2022
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52529
of 2022
Applicant :- Ramakant Yadav
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Somya Chaturvedi,Sr. Advocate
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi, learned Senior
Advocate assisted by Ms. Somya Chaturvedi, learned counsel
for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned Additional
Government Advocate, representing respondent-State and
perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant has filed present application under
Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail in Case No. 211 of 2022, Case
Crime No. 36 of 1998, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 336,
338, 435, 504, 188, 34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law
Amandment Act, Police Station Phoolpur, District Azamgarh,
during trial.
3. As per prosecution case, Akbar Ahmad Dumpy, the
candidate for Azamgarh Loksabha Constituency of B.S.P.
(Bahujan Samaj Party) had come in front of the police post in 6-
7 four wheeler vehicles alongwith 30-40 supporters. Akbar
Ahmad Dumpy and his friend suddenly got agitated and started
abusing the present accused-applicant and his brother in the
filthy languages. He threatened the accused-applicant and his
brother and said that he would remain alive or the accused-
applicant and his brother would be alive. After the exhortation,
Akbar Ahmad Dumpy and his supporters started firing, the
atmosphere of Ambari Bazar got surged. On this, the accused-
applicant, who was the candidate of same Loksabha
Constituency from Samajwadi Party alongwith his brother and
40-50 supporters came there and they also started abusing
Akbar Ahmad Dumpy and his supporters. Both the parties
started firing at each other. They used brick stones etc. on each
other and tried to set on fire the vehicles of each other. The
atmosphere got surged and the people were terrified. The shop
keepers closed their shops and ran away, because of this the law
and order got fully disturbed. The said persons namely, Akbar
Ahmad Dumpy, the present accused-applicant, his brother and
his supporters were arrested under Section 151 Cr.P.C. The
police after investigating the offence, filed the charge under
Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 435, 188, 504, 338, 336 and 34
I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.
4. The accused-applicant was enlarged on bail in the year 1999,
however, it appears that on some date the accused-applicant
could not appear and because of non-appearance, bail bonds
were cancalled and non-bailable warrants were issued. As soon
as the accused-applicant came to know about non-bailable
warrant, he surrendered and he has been in jail since 25th July,
2022. Some of the accused in cross case and in the present case
have been granted anticipatory/regular bail by this Court.
5. Sri Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate
assisted by Ms. Somya Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the
applicant submits that the case is of the year 1998 and the
accused-applicant was cooperating during trial but on some date
he could not appear and therefore the bail bonds were cancelled
and non-bailable warrant was issued. He further submits that
accused-applicant may be enlarged on bail keeping his long
incarceration in jail for more than six months, after the bail
bonds got cancelled.
6. Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned Additional Government
Advocate has opposed the bail application and submitted that
accused-applicant has long criminal history of heinous offence
and while this Court considering the bail application of such
accused should keep in mind the long criminal history of the
accused-applicant. He therefore submits that since the accused-
applicant is involved in several other cases/offences, he is not
entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. I have considered the submissions advanced on behalf of
accused-applicant and State. The dispute/scuffle took place
during election in the year