SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 648

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
PRITAM SINGH AND 6 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 39

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39402 of 2022

Petitioner :- Pritam Singh And 6 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Dhar Shukla

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kaushalendra

Nath Singh learned counsel for the respondent-Development

Authority and perused the record.

This is a wholly misconceived petition filed with the following

reliefs:-

"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the Nature of MANDAMUS

commanding the Noida-Authority to pay compensation @ Rs.44000 per

square meter in place of Rs.22000 per sq.mt. in light of judgment and

order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Hon'ble

Court in the case of (Gajraj and others vs. State of U.P. and others)."

The petitioners herein are claiming compensation at a higher

rate than that has been determined in 191st Board Meeting

dated 21.12.2016 for the benefits granted to the land owners by

the Full Bench of this Court in Gajraj & ors vs State of U.P &

ors reported in 2011 (11) ADJ 1 (FB) in terms of additional

5% of develope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top