ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
PRITAM SINGH AND 6 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39402 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pritam Singh And 6 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Dhar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kaushalendra
Nath Singh learned counsel for the respondent-Development
Authority and perused the record.
This is a wholly misconceived petition filed with the following
reliefs:-
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the Nature of MANDAMUS
commanding the Noida-Authority to pay compensation @ Rs.44000 per
square meter in place of Rs.22000 per sq.mt. in light of judgment and
order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Hon'ble
Court in the case of (Gajraj and others vs. State of U.P. and others)."
The petitioners herein are claiming compensation at a higher
rate than that has been determined in 191st Board Meeting
dated 21.12.2016 for the benefits granted to the land owners by
the Full Bench of this Court in Gajraj & ors vs State of U.P &
ors reported in 2011 (11) ADJ 1 (FB) in terms of additional
5% of develope
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.