HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.
Smt. Sudha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And 3 Others – Respondent
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. - 271 of 2022 at Allahabad
ARBITRATION - LIMITATION - SECTION 34 - Limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 commences from the date on which the party making the application has received a signed copy of the arbitral award.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an order passed by the learned District Judge, Rampur dated August 8, 2022. The appellant submitted that the appeal before the learned District Judge, Rampur was filed within the period prescribed under Section 34(3) of the Act as only the certified copy of the arbitral award was received by the appellant on August 6, 2022 and signed copy of the arbitral award was never received by the appellant.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the learned District Judge should have inquired and found out the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award. In absence of having done so, the learned District Judge has failed to appreciate the law established by the Supreme Court in the case of Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited vs. Navigant Technologies Private Limited reported in (2021) 7 SCC 657 wherein it has been specifically held that the period of limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Act commences from the date on which the party making the application has received a signed copy of the arbitral award.
Issues: Whether the appeal was filed within the limitation period prescribed under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ratio Decidendi: The period of limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 commences from the date on which the party making the application has received a signed copy of the arbitral award.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed. The order dated August 8, 2022 was quashed and set aside and the matter was remanded to the learned District Judge with a direction to examine the records and ascertain the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award and thereafter pass a reasoned order.
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.
1.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing
for the respondents.
2.
This is an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against an order
passed by the learned District Judge, Rampur dated August 8, 2022.
3.
Counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that the appeal before the
learned District Judge, Rampur was filed within the period prescribed under
Section 34(3) of the Act as only the certified copy of the arbitral award was
received by the appellant on August 6, 2022 and signed copy of the arbitral
award was never received by the appellant. Counsel further submits that the
appeal against the said award was filed before the learned District Judge on
August 6, 2022, and therefore, there was no delay in filing of the said
appeal.
4.
Per contra, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits
that the appeal was filed after about a year of passing of the award, and
accordingly, since Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act is not applicable to
Section 34 of the Act, the learned District Judge has acted properly.
5.
Upon perusal of the order passed under Section 34 of the Act, it
appears that the learned District Judge has only recorded the submission of
the appellant that the signed copy of the arbitral award was never received
2
by her. However, there does not appear to be any finding as to when the
signed copy of the award was served upon the appellant.
6.
In my view, the learned District Judge should have inquired and found
out the date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award. In absence of
having done so, the learned District Judge has failed to appreciate the law
established by the Supreme Court in the case of Dakshin Haryana Bijli
Vitran Nigam Limited vs. Navigant Technologies Private Limited reported
in (2021) 7 SCC 657 wherein it has been specifically held that the period of
limitation for challenging an award under Section 34 of the Act commences
from the date on which the party making the application has received a
signed copy of the arbitral award. Relevant paragraphs of the said judgment
are delineated below:-
35.1. The period of 30 days for filing an application under
Section 33 for correction and interpretation of the award, or
additional award may be filed.
35.2. The arbitral proceedings would terminate as provided by
Section 32(1) of the Act.
35.3. The period of limitation for filing objections to the award
under Section 34 commences.
36. Section 34 provides recourse for judicial scrutiny of the
award by a court, upon making an application under sub-
sections (2) and (3) for setting aside the award. The period of
limitation for filing the objections to the award under Section
34 commences from the date on which the party making the
application has “received” a signed copy of the arbitral award,
as required by Section 31(5) of the 1996 Act. Section 34(3)
provides a specific time-limit of three months from the date of
“receipt” of the award, and a further period of thirty days, if
the court is satisfied that the party was prevented by sufficient
3
cause from making the application within the said period, but
not thereafter.”
7.
In view of the fact that the learned District Judge has not recorded any
finding with regard to date of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral
award, I am of the view that the matter is required to be remanded to the
learned District Judge for taking a fresh decision.
8.
In light of the above, the appeal is allowed. The order dated August 8,
2022 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned
District Judge with a direction to examine the records and ascertain the date
of receipt of the signed copy of the arbitral award and thereafter pass a
reasoned order.
Order Date :- 19.3.2024
Rakesh
(Shek
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.