HARVINDAR SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U P AND 5 OTHERS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Headnote:
Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to ensure payment of the entire cane price with 15% compound interest.
Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the dues have already been paid to the petitioner and as such the reliefs claimed in the writ petition no more survive.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.

Court No. - 40

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38509 of 2022

Petitioner :- Harvindar Singh And Another

Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Malhotra,Arvind Srivastava Iii

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravindra Singh

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri P.K. Giri, learned

Addl. Chief Standing Counsel and Shri Ravindra Singh, learned

counsel for respondent no.5.

Present writ petition has been preferred for a direction to

respondents to ensure payment of entire cane price to the

petitioners with 15% compound interest.

Shri Ravind Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.5 has

stated that the dues have already been paid to the petitioner and

as such the reliefs claimed in the writ petition no more survive.

The aforesaid fact has been acknowledged by learned counsel

for the petitioner.

In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having

become infructuous.

Order Date :- 4.1.2023

SP/

Digitally signed by :-

SURYA PRAKASH

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad