SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 1062

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ram Ji And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6710 of 2011 at Allahabad



Advocates:
Petitioner: V.P. Srivastava
Respondent:Govt. Advocate

The prosecution must prove the essential elements of dowry death, particularly the 'soon before' requirement, which was not satisfied in this case.

Headnote:

Dowry - Criminal Appeals - IPC Sections [304-B, 498-A] and DP Act [4] - The court analyzed the essential ingredients of dowry death and cruelty, concluding that the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements, particularly the 'soon before' requirement, leading to acquittal of most accused.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the death of a woman shortly after marriage, with allegations of dowry demands and cruelty by her in-laws. The prosecution claimed she was tortured and died from injuries inflicted by her in-laws, while the defense argued she was healthy when she returned to her parental home.

Issues: Whether the accused were guilty of dowry death and cruelty under IPC sections 304-B and 498-A, and whether the prosecution proved the essential elements of these offenses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the prosecution must prove the essential ingredients of dowry death, particularly the element of 'soon before' the death, which was not established in this case.

Final Decision: The appeals were partly allowed; the conviction of the mother-in-law was upheld for cruelty, while the other accused were acquitted.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

1. Since these appeals have been filed by the accused appellants against the same judgement and order, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common order.

2. Feeling aggrieved with the judgment and order dated 9.9.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.13, Allahabad in S.T. No. 618 of 2006 arising out of Crime No. 193 of 2003 under Section 304-B/34, 498-A/34 I.P.C. and 4 D.P. Act, P.S.- Kydganj, Allahabad, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced under Section 304-B/34 I.P.C. for 10 years rigorous imprisonment, under Section 498-A/ 34 I.P.C. for 2 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2,000/- each with default clause and under Section 4 D.P. Act for 1 year simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000/- each with default clause and all the sentences were to run concurrently, the present criminal appeals have been preferred by convict-appellants 1. Ram Ji, 2. Smt. Sumari Devi, 3. Mahendra Kumar, 4. Dwarika Prasad, 5. Ram Prasad, 6. Smt. Manju, 7. Smt. Manisha, 8. Smt. Urmila and 9. Smt. Kusum.

3. Out of nine convict appellants, convict Ram Ji and Dwarika Prasad have died and reports regarding their death are available on record. Hence, the appeals qua convict appellants Ram Ji and Dwarika Prasad stand abated.

4. The prosecution story as unfolded in the FIR is that Urmila, the daughter of the informant Chote Lal was married with Ram Ji s/o Shyam Sundar on 11.11.2003 and when she came to her matrimonial house after marriage a demand for one scooter and Rs.50,000/- cash was made by her in-laws as an additional dowry and she was also threatened for dire consequences in case the demand made by the in-laws was not satisfied. She came back to her parental house and when on 27.11.2003 she again went to her matrimonial house she was tortured and burnt by pouring hot mustered oil, which resulted into the burning of her right hand and leg; On her telephone call, Ghanshyam, the son of the informant and his son- in-law Chaman Kumar went to the house of her in-laws on 3.12.2003 and the deceased was taken to her parental house and when they were taking her to the hospital on 4.12.2003, she died on way at 7 am.

5. On the written report of informant FIR was lodged on 4.12.2003 at 10.00 am against 9 named accused persons and investigation started.

6. Inquest proceedings were performed by Tehsildar Bara, Brajendra Singh on 4.12.2003 and subsequently her dead body was examined by Dr. A.K. Mehrotra on 6.12.2003, who prepared the autopsy report and found several ante-mortem injuries over the body of the deceased and the cause of death was found coma as a result of ante-mortem head injury.

7. The matter was investigated initially by Shri Prakash Swaroop Pandey, Dy. S.P. EOW, who during course of investigation inspected the place of occurrence and prepared site plan, made arrest of accused persons and also proceeded to interrogate the witnesses of this case and subsequently the investigation was transferred to Shri Rajesh Kumar, C.O. City, Firozabad, who completed the rest formalities of the investigation and after collecting sufficient evidence submitted charge sheet to the Court.

8. The offence being exclusively triable by the Sessions Court was committed to the Court of Sessions by the Magistrate where charges under Section 498-A/34, 304-B/34 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act were framed against all the charge sheeted nine accused persons. They denied all the charges and claimed for trial.

9. To bring home the charges against the accused-appellants the prosecution relied upon the oral evidence and in all as many as 10 prosecution witnesses were examined. P.W.1 Chote Lal, informant/ father of the deceased, P.W.2 Ghanshyam Kumar, brother of the deceased, P.W.3 Km. Shabnam, sister of the deceased and formal witnesses P.W.4 Dr. Veerendra Singh, medical officer, P.W.5 Crt. Mhr. Rampati Singh, P.W.6 Dr. R.D. Ram, P.W.7 Rajesh Kumar, C.O. City, second I.O, P.W.8 Dy. S.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top