SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 577

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Chandrasen Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner:Alok Ranjan Mishra and Sr. Advocate
Respondent: G.A.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Alok Ranjan Mishra,, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasiya, learned State Law Officer and perused the record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 123 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352, 103(1), 109(1), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. , Police Station Bahariya, District Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial.

PROSECUTION STORY:

4. The applicant along with co-accused persons is stated to have formed an unlawful assembly and fired at the informant and other persons and it has been categorically mentioned in the FIR that the dispute arose with Surendra Yadav and Abhishek Yadav who had fired from his rifle at Mulayam Yadav causing his death and Gajraj Yadav is stated to have fired at Jitendra causing gun shot wound to his thigh and the applicant is stated to have been carrying hockey at that time. The incident is of 30.07.2024 at about 2:15 p.m.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT :

5. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has nothing to do with the said offence.

6. The FIR is delayed by about 12 hours and there i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top