2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 265
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SOCIETY FOR VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND JUSTICE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND 10 OTHERS – Respondent
WPIL 2248 2022
Court No. - 29
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2248 of 2022
Petitioner :- Society For Voice Of Human Rights And Justice And
Another
Respondent :- Union Of India And 10 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav,Ravindra Nath Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pawan Kumar Srivastava,Sanjay
Kumar Yadav,Vimlesh Kumar Rai,Vivek Saran
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Acting Chief Justice
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Ravindra Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the
petitioner-society; Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for
respondent no.2; Sri Vivek Saran, learned counsel for
respondent no.7; Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for
respondent no.8; Sri Vimlesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for
respondent no.9 and Sri A.K. Goyal, learned counsel for the
State-respondents.
2. Present petition has been described to be a public interest
litigation. Status of the present petitioners apart, they have
sought relief directing concrete action to be taken against the
erring officials of Nagar Palika Parishad, Loni, District-
Ghaziabad who are alleged to be involved in embezzlement of
public funds of more than 300 crores as has been noted in the
report of the enquiry committee constituted by the District
Administration of District-Ghaziabad. Further, direction has
been sought requiring appropriate action to be taken pursuant to
first information report lodged against such officers of Nagar
Palika Parishad, Loni, District-Ghaziabad. Last, direction has
been sought seeking recovery of Rs. 300 crores from the erring
officers of the said Nagar Palika Parishad.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having
perused the record, vide order dated 03.10.2022 passed by the
Director, Local Bodies, Uttar Pradesh, a prima facie satisfaction
was recorded that one Sri Krishna Kumar Badhana, the then
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Loni had engaged in
some misdeeds involving engagement of daily wage employee
on muster roll. He was suspended and an enquiry initiated
against him.
4. Also, earlier on 30.05.2022, an FIR had been registered in
Case Crime No. 594 of 2022 at Police Station - Loni, District -
Ghaziabad, under Sections - 409, 120-B, 204 and 187 IPC
against the then Executive Officer as also the Chairman of the
Nagar Palika Parishad alongwith one clerk Sri Pranav Rai.
5. The counter affidavit filed by Sri A.K. Goyal, learned
Standing Counsel reveals, the police investigation arising from
the above criminal case is pending. It also appears, the civil
proceedings arising from the order dated 03.10.2022 passed by
the Director, Local Bodies is pending. Thus, both civil and
criminal proceedings are pending with respect to the cause of
action projected before this Court. Since civil and criminal
proceedings are pending at the original stage i.e. proceedings in
the nature of domestic enquiry are being conducted against the
suspended Executive Officer of the Nagar Palika Parishad, Loni
and further since criminal investigation is under way, this Court
would tread light on the points being canvassed, at this stage.
6. The Supreme Court in Sanjai Tiwari Vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh & Anr., AIR 2021 SC 162, referred to its earlier order
in the case of Janata DAl Vs. H.S. Chowdhary & Ors and
observed, in the context of specific criminal proceedings
brought against the accused persons, it is for them and them
alone to raise all questions to challenge the same.
7. In the present case, in face of civil and criminal proceedings
being pending and the matter being at a wholly preliminary
state, it is left open to the petitioners to pursue their remedies
where they lie with respect to allegation of corruption etc.
8. Without making any observation as to merit as may prejudice
the ongoing civil and criminal proceedings, interference
claimed in the present proceedings is declined, at this stage.
9. Present petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :-