ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GOVIND KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/33262/2022
Fact of the Case:
The applicant, Govind Kumar, was arrested and charged with forgery and cheating for allegedly using a fake appointment letter to secure a job as a medical officer. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had joined the office on the basis of the fake appointment letter and that when the confirmation request was called from the higher authority, it was discovered that no such appointment letter had been issued.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant was entitled to be released on bail, considering the nature of the allegations, the severity of the punishment in case of conviction, and the nature of the supporting evidence.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to be released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to be released on bail because there was no reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and the applicant had no criminal antecedents.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33262
of 2022
Applicant :- Govind Kumar
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Singh,Krishna Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA
for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the
applicant with a prayer to admit him on bail in Case Crime No.
148 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police
Station Sadar Bazar, District Mathura, during the pendency of
trial.
As per the prosecution case, on 5.5.2022 Chief Medical Officer,
Mahtura lodged a written complaint alleging that the applicant
had joined the office on 30.4.2022 on the basis of appointement
letter issued by the Directorate General dated 11.4.2020 and
when the confirmation rquest was called from the higher
authority about the said appointment letter, the office of
Director (Paramedical) Medical and Health through its letter
dated 5.5.2022 informed that no such appointment letter has
been issued from the concerned office and the alleged
appointment letter is fake.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated
in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is furtehr
submitted that apart from the appointment letter and statement
of the complaiant, there is no other evidence to connect the
applicant with the alleged crime. There is no cogent and reliable
evidence adduced by the police connecting the applicant. It is
next submitted that the circumstances which, as per counsel, led
to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched
upon at length. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is
also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being
released on bail, the applicant may flee from the course of law
or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is
in jail since 5.5.2022 and the possibility of conclusion of trial in
near future is very bleak.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the
applicant contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot
be adjudged at pre trial stage but could not dispute the aforesaid
submission of the learned counsel for the applicant.
Looking to the nature of allegations levelled against the
applicant and submission made in the bail application, without
expressing any opinion on the merits of case and considering
the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case
of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence,
particularly since no reasonable apprehension of tampering with
the witnesses has been alleged, prima facie, this Court finds, the
applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Accordingly bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Govind Kumar involved in the aforesaid case
crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of
Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned with the following
conditions:
(i) That the applicant shall cooperate with the expeditious
disposal of the trial and shall regularly attend the court unless
inevitable.
(ii) That the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the
evidence.
(iii) That after his release, the applicant shall not involve in any
criminal activity.
(iv) The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be
verified by court concerned before the release of the applicant.
In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above,
court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the
applicant.
Order Date :- 5.1.2023
M. Tarik
Digital
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.