SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2968

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
RAMESHWAR PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 40

E-Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39713 of 2022

Petitioner :- Rameshwar Prasad

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Utsav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

Heard Mr. Utsav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.

Kritika Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the

State-respondents.

Present writ petition is preferred for direction in the nature of

mandamus commanding the respondents to get the encroachment

removed from the Chakroad land which has been illegally

encroached by private respondents and further direction be issued

to the State respondents to construct the pucca Chak road as per

the consolidation map of village bhauri pargana tehsil Karvi which

runs from plot no. 1656 to 1705 prepared by consolidation

authority within the short stipulated period as may fixed by this

Hon'ble Court.

In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has

placed reliance upon the order dated 21.12.2011 passed by the

Division Bench of Lucknow Bench in Misc. Bench No. 12801 of

2011 (Ran Bahadur Singh Vs. State of U.P. thru. Secr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top