ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA,SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 999 of 2023
Petitioner :- Pradeep
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Singh Chauhan,Anoop Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,
learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.
The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the
impugned First Information Report dated 18.02.2019 registered as Case
Crime No. 202 of 2019, under Sections 489-C IPC, Police Station
Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahar and for a direction to the respondents
not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information
Report.
The submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with
imprisonment of seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to
follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioner
has been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been
placed on the judgements of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of
Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar
Vs. U
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.