2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 4271
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J
UMA SHANKAR SINGH AND 10 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A482/2704/2023
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2704 of 2023
Applicant :- Uma Shankar Singh And 10 Others
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for setting aside the
order dated 30.9.2022 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Court No.3, Ballia on Application No.96 Kha filed under Section 321 Cr.P.C. in
Session Trial No.12 of 2015 (State Vs. Ramdev Ram and others), arising out of
Case Crime No.38 of 2010, under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471
IPC and Sections 13(1)(c) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, Police
Station Kotwali, District Ballia, pending in the aforesaid court.
2. The complainant, Dev Nandan son of Hari Narain, who claims himself to be the
proprietor of Dev Construction Company, had given a complaint to the
Secretary/Manager of the District Cooperative Bank, Bhrigu Ashram, Ballia
alleging that some imposter had opened the account in the name of Dev
Construction Company in District Cooperative Bank, Bhrigu Ashram, Ballia and
the entire money was withdrawn by the said imposter fraudulently. The bank
conducted a detailed enquiry and a direction was issued to the Branch Manager for
lodging an FIR.
3. In pursuance to the aforesaid direction, the FIR was registered at Police Station
Kotwali, District Ballia at Case Crime No.38 of 2010, under Section 409 IPC by
Rama Shanker Rai, a bank official on 21.5.2010. The FIR would disclose that one
Ajay Kumar Sharma, Son of Akshaya Lal Sharma had opened the account in the
name of Dev Construction Company and had withdrawn the deposited amount.
4. Petitioner no.1 is a apolitical activist and a business man. He is sitting Member
of Legislative Assembly from Rasra Constituency of District Ballia and is engaged
in several social activities for upliftment of poor people, such as solemnizing
marriages of poor couples and engaging them in employment and distribution of
food grains to the needy poor people. It is also said that during COVID-19
pandemic, petitioner no.1 made available about 500 oxygen cylinders along with its
accessories to the District Hospital, Ballia from his own resources. He is a reputed
man and commands respect in every walk of life. The complainant is also in
construction business and he carries out the construction work and take contracts in
the name of his proprietorship of Dev Construction Company.
5. It is said that Dev Nandan, sole proprietor of Dev Construction Company, under
the influence of his father, who was a Minister, had opened an account in the
District Cooperative Bank, Ballia. It is said that Dev Nandan had withdrawn the
amounts from the bank, which was deposited in the said account in respect of the
payment received for construction work carried out by Dev Construction Company.
The account opened in the District Cooperative Bank, Bhrigu Ashram, Ballia was
closed on 4.10.2004 and, thereafter, no transaction was made from the said account.
It is said that the complaint regarding fraudulent withdrawal of amount from the
said account of Dev Construction Company was made on 30.10.2008 by Dev
Nandan i.e. after four years from the date of closing down the account.
6. On this complaint, an enquiry was conducted by the bank and the matter was
transferred to the CBCID for investigation. The CBCID after investigating the
offence, filed charge sheet under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471
IPC and Section 13(1)(c) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act. Cognizance
was taken on the charge sheet and the petitioners were summoned to face the trial.
The petitioners obtained bail from the learned trial court itself.
7. It is further said that the complainant and the accused named in the FIR,
thereafter, had settled the dispute amicably and the complainant gave an affidavit in
the trial court stating that