ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ABRAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/41878/2022
NDPS ACT - BAIL - APPLICANT ARRESTED WITH 1500 TABLETS OF ALPRAZOLAM - NO COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 50 NDPS ACT - BAIL REJECTED
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested with 1500 tablets of Alprazolam, weighing 225 grams, which is above the commercial quantity of 100 grams. The applicant argued that the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were not complied with during the recovery.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant did not opt to be searched before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer, and therefore, there was substantial compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act.
Issues: Whether the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were complied with during the recovery of the Alprazolam tablets.
Ratio Decidendi: Considering the stringent provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and the fact that the applicant was in possession of more than the commercial quantity of Alprazolam, the court held that it was not a fit case to release the applicant on bail.
Final Decision: The court rejected the applicant's bail application.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41878 of 2022
Applicant :- Abrar
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the
applicant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State-
respondent.
The instant application has been filed seeking release of the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 295 of 2022, under
Sections 8/22 NDPS, Police Station Gulawathi, District
Bulandshahar, during pendency of the trial in the court below.
According to the allegation, applicant was arrested along with
three other co-accused and from the possession of the applicant,
1500 tablets of Alprazolam were recovered and total weight of
tablets were 225 grams.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has
falsely been implicated in the present case and nothing
incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He
further submitted that till date, there is no FSL report on record
which can show that recovered substance was Alprazolam. He
further submitted that at the time of recovery, neither public
witness was taken nor any attempt was made in this regard and
at the time of alleged recovery, provisions of Section 50 NDPS
Act have not been complied with. He further submitted that
applicant in the present matter is in jail since 5.8.2022 and he is
having no previous criminal history, therefore, applicant may be
released on bail.
Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail and
submitted that 225 gram Alprazolam was recovered from the
possession of the applicant which involves the commercial
quantity, therefore, considering the provisions of Section 37
NDPS Act, applicant could not be released on bail.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record of the case.
From the possession of applicant, 1500 tablets of Alprazolam
weighing about 225 gram was recovered which is well above
the commercial quantity of 100 grams.
Although, learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the
time of recovery, provisions of Section 50 NDPS Act have not
been complied with but from the perusal of the recovery memo,
it reflects that before search an option was given to the
applicant that if he wants then search may be taken by either a
Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate but he did not opt to be
searched either before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer and
thereafter on his consent search was made, therefore, it appears
that there is a substantial compliance of section 50 NDPS Act.
As from the possession of applicant, 225 gram of Alprazolam
tablet were recovered which is more than commercial quantity,
therefore, considering the stringent provision of section 37
NDPS Act, in view of this Court, it is not a fit case to release
the applicant on bail.
Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected.
Order Date :- 9.1.2023
Ankita
Digitally signed by :-
ANKITA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.