SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 417

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ABRAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/41878/2022



In cases involving the recovery of commercial quantities of drugs under the NDPS Act, bail is not to be granted lightly.

Headnote:

NDPS ACT - BAIL - APPLICANT ARRESTED WITH 1500 TABLETS OF ALPRAZOLAM - NO COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 50 NDPS ACT - BAIL REJECTED

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested with 1500 tablets of Alprazolam, weighing 225 grams, which is above the commercial quantity of 100 grams. The applicant argued that the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were not complied with during the recovery.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant did not opt to be searched before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer, and therefore, there was substantial compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act.

Issues: Whether the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were complied with during the recovery of the Alprazolam tablets.

Ratio Decidendi: Considering the stringent provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and the fact that the applicant was in possession of more than the commercial quantity of Alprazolam, the court held that it was not a fit case to release the applicant on bail.

Final Decision: The court rejected the applicant's bail application.

Court No. - 84

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41878 of 2022

Applicant :- Abrar

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Yadav

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the

applicant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State-

respondent.

The instant application has been filed seeking release of the

applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 295 of 2022, under

Sections 8/22 NDPS, Police Station Gulawathi, District

Bulandshahar, during pendency of the trial in the court below.

According to the allegation, applicant was arrested along with

three other co-accused and from the possession of the applicant,

1500 tablets of Alprazolam were recovered and total weight of

tablets were 225 grams.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has

falsely been implicated in the present case and nothing

incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He

further submitted that till date, there is no FSL report on record

which can show that recovered substance was Alprazolam. He

further submitted that at the time of recovery, neither public

witness was taken nor any attempt was made in this regard and

at the time of alleged recovery, provisions of Section 50 NDPS

Act have not been complied with. He further submitted that

applicant in the present matter is in jail since 5.8.2022 and he is

having no previous criminal history, therefore, applicant may be

released on bail.

Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail and

submitted that 225 gram Alprazolam was recovered from the

possession of the applicant which involves the commercial

quantity, therefore, considering the provisions of Section 37

NDPS Act, applicant could not be released on bail.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record of the case.

From the possession of applicant, 1500 tablets of Alprazolam

weighing about 225 gram was recovered which is well above

the commercial quantity of 100 grams.

Although, learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the

time of recovery, provisions of Section 50 NDPS Act have not

been complied with but from the perusal of the recovery memo,

it reflects that before search an option was given to the

applicant that if he wants then search may be taken by either a

Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate but he did not opt to be

searched either before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer and

thereafter on his consent search was made, therefore, it appears

that there is a substantial compliance of section 50 NDPS Act.

As from the possession of applicant, 225 gram of Alprazolam

tablet were recovered which is more than commercial quantity,

therefore, considering the stringent provision of section 37

NDPS Act, in view of this Court, it is not a fit case to release

the applicant on bail.

Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected.

Order Date :- 9.1.2023

Ankita

Digitally signed by :-

ANKITA SRIVASTAVA

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top