SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2261

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRAVEEN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 79

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41001 of 2022

Applicant :- Praveen Sharma

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Dwivedi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ravindra Nath Yadav,Santosh Kumar

Verma

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant,

learned counsel for the State, Ravindra Nath Yadav, learned counsel for

the informant and perused the material on record.

This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has

been filed by the applicant Praveen Sharma, seeking enlargement on bail

during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 397 of 2021, under

Sections under section 363, 366, 376, 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 5/6

POCSO Act, registered at P.S.- Parasrampur, District- Basti.

The submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant is that the

applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case

due to ulterior motive. There is contradiction in the statement of victim

recorded under section 161, 164 Cr.P.C. According to medical examination

report the victim is aged about 20 years and doctor has no d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top