SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2259

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHOTU ALIAS PRAMOD SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 79

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27839

of 2022

Applicant :- Chotu Alias Pramod Sen

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Istiyaq Ali,Ali Hasan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for

the State and perused the record.

2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case. He submits that the victim in her statement

recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has specifically stated that

she has solemnised marriage with the applicant, however, in her

statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C there is not even a

whisper about the marriage. He further submits that there was a

consensual relationship between the applicant and the victim

and the allegation of rape does not corroborate with the medical

report with the prosecution version. Several other submissions

in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made

against the applicant have also been placed before the Court.

The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the

false i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top