ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHOTU ALIAS PRAMOD SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27839
of 2022
Applicant :- Chotu Alias Pramod Sen
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Istiyaq Ali,Ali Hasan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for
the State and perused the record.
2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the
present case. He submits that the victim in her statement
recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has specifically stated that
she has solemnised marriage with the applicant, however, in her
statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C there is not even a
whisper about the marriage. He further submits that there was a
consensual relationship between the applicant and the victim
and the allegation of rape does not corroborate with the medical
report with the prosecution version. Several other submissions
in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made
against the applicant have also been placed before the Court.
The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the
false i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.