ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJJAB @ HUKAMA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/47829/2022
BAIL - SECTION 457, 380, 411 IPC - SUMMARY - Court granted bail to the accused who was arrested three months after the alleged theft and only Rs.2100/- was recovered from his possession, considering the fact that he was in jail since August, 2022 and offences are triable by Magistrate First Class.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested three months after the alleged theft and only Rs.2100/- was recovered from his possession. He was not named in the FIR and had a long criminal history of more than 30 cases but was on bail in all of them.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR and was arrested three months after the alleged incident. Only Rs.2100/- was recovered from his possession and no recovery of any valuable like jewellery was shown from his possession. The court also noted that the applicant was in jail since August, 2022 and the offences were triable by Magistrate First Class.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to be released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to be released on bail considering the fact that he was in jail since August, 2022 and the offences were triable by Magistrate First Class.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47829 of 2022
Applicant :- Rajjab @ Hukama
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- P.K. Rao
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit filed today on behalf of applicant, is
taken on record.
2. Heard Sri P.K.Rao, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
Jhamman Ram, learned AGA, for the State.
3. The instant bail application has been moved on behalf of the
applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime
No.102 of 2022 under Sections 457,380 and 411 IPC, Police
Station Chilla, District Banda during pendency of the trial.
4. As per the allegation on 26/27.5.2022, a theft was committed
in the house of the informant and when applicant was arrested
then he confessed his guilt and from his possession Rs.2100/-
were recovered.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is
innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present
matter. He did not commit any theft in the house of informant.
He further submits that FIR of the present case was lodged on
29.6.2022 against unknown persons with regard to a theft
alleged to have been committed in the intervening night of
26/27.5.2022 and after three months, i.e., on 27.8.2022
applicant was apprehended and from his possession it is alleged
that Rs.2100/- was recovered and he confessed his guilt.
6. He next submitted that applicant although implicated in
other as many as 31 cases but in all the cases he has falsely
been implicated by the Police and in all the cases he has already
been released on bail and the present matter is triable by
Magistrate First Class and applicant in the present case is in jail
since August, 2022.
7. Per contra, learned AGA submits that applicant is having
long criminal history of more than 30 cases but he could not
dispute the fact that in the present case applicant is in jail since
27.8.2022 and only Rs.2100/- was recovered from his
possession after about three months from the date of alleged
theft and in all the cases he has already been released on bail.
8. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and have
perused the record of the case.
9. The applicant is not named in the FIR and after three months
of the alleged incident he was apprehended and on his
confessional statement he made accused in the present matter
and only Rs.2100/- was shown from his possession and no
recovery of any valuable like jewellery was shown from the
possession of the applicant.
10 Although applicant is having criminal history of more than
30 cases but in all the cases he is on bail and in the present case
he is in Jail since 27.8.2022 and all the offences are triable by
Magistrate First Class, therefore, considering the fact that
applicant is in jail in the present matter since August, 2022 and
offences are triable by Magistrate First Class, in my view, the
applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
11. In the light of discussions made above, without expressing
any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail
application is allowed.
12 Let the applicant-Rajjab alias Hukama be released on bail
in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two
sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates
fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the
evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-
social activity.
13. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the
prosecution will be at liberty to move an application befo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.