SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 96099

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW BENCH)
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
Rakesh Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Sachin Pandey
Respondent:

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. By means of the present application under Section 483 Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed for expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 2412 of 2023 (Rakesh Kumar Pathak Vs. Om Prakash Yadav) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 pending in the court of First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 17, District Sultanpur.

3. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that opposite party wanted to sell his property to the applicant to the tune of Rs.3,00,000/-. In this regard, the applicant had given Rs.2,50,000/- to opposite party and thereafter opposite party did not sell his property to the applicant. When the applicant asked the opposite party to return his money. Opposite party had given a cheque bearing No. 000006 of Bank of Baroda amounting to Rs.2,50,000/-. The applicant presented the said cheque before the bank for encashment but the same was dishonoured with regard "insufficient fund". The applicant sent a legal notice to opposite party with regard to dishonour of cheque. Despite legal notice, opposite party fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top