SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 96085

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Smt. Shailkumari – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Rajesh Kumar
Respondent: G.A. and Manoj Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

3. In the cause list the name of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh is printed as learned counsel for the first informant but there is no vakalatnama on record of the said learned counsel. Office to trace out the same and place the same on record, if filed, by the next date and make a note in the order sheet regarding the same.

4. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant-Smt. Shailkumari, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.651 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80(2) BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, registered at P.S.Handia, District Prayagraj.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued as follows:

(i) The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case.

(ii) The applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased Manisha.

(iii) The marriage of the deceased Manisha was solemnized with Subhash, the son of the applicant 25.6.2021.

(iv) General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top