SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 96134

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12304 of 2025 at Allahabad



Advocates:
Petitioner: Rayoof Ali
Respondent: G.A.

The court emphasized that delays and contradictions in the FIR can significantly impact the credibility of allegations, justifying the granting of bail.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 506, 395, 376D - Bail application - Applicant seeks bail during trial for alleged gang rape and robbery - Delay of seven months in lodging FIR raises questions of credibility - No medical corroboration of the incident and absence of criminal history of the applicant noted - Court finds it a fit case for bail considering contradictions in FIR and lack of injuries on the victim. (Paras 3, 6, 12, 13)

(B) Bail - Principles governing bail - The court must consider the nature of the allegations, the delay in filing the FIR, and the applicant's criminal history when deciding on bail applications. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of gang rape and robbery, allegedly occurring on 23.05.2024, with a significant delay in FIR filing and no corroborative medical evidence.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the bail application, emphasizing the contradictions in the FIR and the absence of injuries on the victim.

Issues: The main issues included the credibility of the FIR due to its delay and contradictions, and the applicant's innocence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the delay in lodging the FIR and the contradictions within it warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing that the observations made would not influence the trial court's independent judgment.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Rayoof Ali, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Utkarsh Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 23 of 2025, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 506, 395, 376D of IPC,, Police Station - Khalilabad, District - Sant Kabir Nagar, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant along with four other named accused persons and three unknown persons is stated to have committed gang rape with the victim on 23.05.2024 at about 12 Noon in the agricultural field whereby several shepherds are stated to be grazing their cattles there and on seeing them, the applicant and other co-accused persons are stated to have run away from the place of occurrence after threatening her. The accused persons are stated to be armed with weapons. The accused persons are also stated to have snatched away her ornaments.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. The FIR is delayed by about seven months and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. Even the application u/s 154(3) Cr.P.C. has been moved after a delay, as such, it is a clear cut case of false implication.

6. Learned counsel has also stated that another factor that has to be considered is that the father and son duo have been implicated in the case of gang rape which cannot be believed in Indian Society. The victim is a married lady and she is 35 years old as per her own statement recorded u/s 183 BNSS. There is no medical corroboration of the incident. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.03.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

7. Per contra, learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail application and has placed much reliance upon the statement of the accused persons and has stated that they were confessed their crime. The applicant and other co- accused persons have snatched away the ornaments of the victim and had committed gang rape with her.

8. Learned counsel for the informant has further stated that the informant has approached several authorities for taking action against the accused persons but no action had been taken against them. She had filed a Writ Petition No. 20739 of 2024 before this Court wherein the following order was passed on 10.12.2024:-

"1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:

"(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 22.07.2024 prepared by the respondent no. 3.

(B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.register first information report on application supported on affidavit dated 12.07.2024."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that the impugned notice dated 22.07.2024 which has been prepared by the respondent No.3, is unsustainable in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. State of U.P. and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1 (Para-110).

4. Before proceeding further on merit, let respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 may file affidavit in the matter on or before the date fixed.

5. List this matter again in top ten cases on 19.12.2024."

9. Subsequently, on 07.01.2025, the following order has been passed in the said writ petition:-

"1. On the request of the learned A.G.A., the matter is adjourned. Suffice it to indicate on or before the next date fixed, the order dated 10-12-2024 is to be complied with.

2. List this matter again on 27-01-2025 in top ten of the cases. "

10. Learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top