SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Rayoof Ali
Respondent: G.A.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Rayoof Ali, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Utkarsh Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 23 of 2025, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 506, 395, 376D of IPC,, Police Station - Khalilabad, District - Sant Kabir Nagar, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant along with four other named accused persons and three unknown persons is stated to have committed gang rape with the victim on 23.05.2024 at about 12 Noon in the agricultural field whereby several shepherds are stated to be grazing their cattles there and on seeing them, the applicant and other co-accused persons are stated to have run away from the place of occurrence after threatening her. The accused persons are stated to be armed with weapons. The accused persons are also stated to have snatched away her ornaments.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top