SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 944

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Sikandar Kumar Sonkar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Vishesh Kumar
Respondent: G.A.

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

1-Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State.

2-The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 02 of 2025, under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, Police Station-Anti Corruption Varanasi, District-Anti Corruption Organization, U.P. (Varanasi) during the pendency of trial.

3-As per the prosecution case, complainant gave a complaint on 03.03.2025 to Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anti Corruption Organization, Varanasi, Division Varanasi making allegation inter-alia that he is running a shop of tiles and marble under the name and style of Science Ceramic and Industries situated at Amra Akhri, Varanasi. On account of non-deposit of VAT in time, his matter is pending before Sales Tax OfÏce and when he went to Bank of India to know the statement of his bank account, he came to know that his bank account has been seized by Amin (present applicant) and subsequently, when he met with the applicant, he demanded a bribe of Rs. ten thousand for getting his bank account defreezed. Later

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top