Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J
U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) And Another – Appellant
Versus
Spml Infra Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing counsel for both parties (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute over execution case and time-bar validity (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding the maintainability of execution cases (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's examination of statutory provisions and case law (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. conclusion upholding the validity of the impugned order (Para 9 , 10) |
PIYUSH AGRAWAL,J.
1. Heard Shri Vimlesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ujjawal Satsangi, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The instant petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 21.09.2024 passed by the Commercial Court, Jhansi in Arbitration Execution Case No. 04/2024.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent was awarded a contract, which could not be completed within the stipulated period as provided in the agreement/mutual consent. As such, a dispute arose between the parties and the matter was referred to the Arbitrator. He further submits that on 03.03.2010, an award was passed against the petitioners awarding Rs. 92,04,289/- with 8% interest. Against the aforesaid award dated 03.03.2010, the petitioners filed an application under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
