SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 32463

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANGEET @ RAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 67

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33983 of 2016

Applicant :- Sangeet @ Raju

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Dwivedi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved seeking the

quashing of cognizance order dated 5.4.2016 taken on the

charge sheet dated 23.3.2016 in Case No.290 of 2016 (State vs.

Sangeet @ Raju), arising out of Case Crime No.47 of 2016, u/s

363 I.P.C. and Section 11/12 of Protection of children from

Sexual Offences Act, Police Station-Partapur, District-Meerut,

pending before learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional

District & Sessions Judge, Court No.12, Meerut.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and

also perused the record.

The submissions made by the applicant's counsel call for

adjudication on pure questions of fact which may be adequately

adjudicated upon only by the trial court. This Court does not

deem it proper, and therefore cannot be persuaded to have a pre-

trial before the actual trial begins. A threadbare discussion of

various facts and circumstances, as they emerge from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top