2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 32482
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHHOTU LAL MEENA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A482/28804/2022
Upon submission of two different police reports, in the same case crime number, the court is under an obligation to decide the two police reports simultaneously and then discharge the accused in case the offence complained of is not established as per the papers accompanying the police reports or proceed against the applicant in case it is established.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 482 - DISCHARGE APPLICATION - REJECTION - TWO POLICE REPORTS
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a discharge application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., challenging the order dated 5.8.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gorakhpur in Crl. Case No. 533 of 2016, whereby his discharge application was rejected.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the discharge application filed by the applicant was misconceived and that the court below was under an obligation to decide the two police reports simultaneously and then discharge the accused in case the offence complained of is not established as per the papers accompanying the police reports or proceed against the applicant in case it is established.
Issues: Whether the court below was justified in rejecting the discharge application filed by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court in Vinay Tyagi Vs. Irshad Ali @ Deepak and Others (2013) 5 SCC 762 has held that upon submission of two different police reports, in the same case crime number, the court is under an obligation to decide the two police reports simultaneously and then discharge the accused in case the offence complained of is not established as per the papers accompanying the police reports or proceed against the applicant in case it is established.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the application and directed the court below to pass a fresh order in the light of the law noted above within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Court No. - 66
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28804 of 2022
Applicant :- Chhotu Lal Meena
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for
applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is to the
order dated 5.8.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate-II, Gorakhpur in Crl. Case No. 533 of 2016 (State
Vs. Subhash Dubey and Others) arising out of Case Crime
No.59 of 2015, under Section 147, 332, 353, 427, 504, 506
I.P.C. and Section 7 Crl. Law Amendment Act, Police Station
Shahpur, District Gorakhpur whereby the discharge application
filed by applicant has been rejected.
Record shows that initially the police had submitted a report
under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. (charge sheet) dated 16.5.2015.
Subsequently, the Investigating Officer in exercise of
jurisdiction under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. further investigated
the matter and submitted a police report dated 20.3.2017 (final
report) whereby it was stated that criminality alleged against the
applicant is not found to be established.
In view of above, applicant filed a discharge application before
court below dated 26.11.2021 seeking his challenge which has
been rejected by court below by means of impugned order dated
5.8.2022.
Perusal of impugned order dated 5.8.2022 passed by court
below will go to show that court below has rejected the
discharge application on the ground that since cognizance has
already been taken upon first charge sheet, therefore, no ground
exists to consider the discharge application filed by the
applicant.
What shall be the procedure followed by courts upon
submission of two different police reports, in same case crime
number is no longer res integra and stands settled by the
judgment of the Supreme Court in Vinay Tyagi Vs. Irshad Ali
@ Deepak and Others (2013) 5 SCC 762.
Paragraph of the said report is relevant for the controversy in
hand. According the same is reproduced herein under :
In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court as noted
above the discharge application filed by the applicant was
misconceived. The Court is now under an obligation to decide
the two police reports simultaneously and then discharge the
accused in case the offence complained of is not established as
per the papers accompanying the police reports or proceed
against the applicant in case it is established.
Thus no illegality has been comitted by Court below in
rejecting the discharge application.
Court below shall now pass a fresh order in the light of law
noted above within a period of four weeks from the date of
production of certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation this application stands disposed
of.
Order Date :- 10.1.2023
Md Faisal
Digitally signed by :-
MOHD FAISAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad