2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 20919
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHAN PAL RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A482/19060/2022
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19060 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohan Pal Rawat
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pandey,Gaurav Singh
Chauhan,Rajesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and
Shri Ankit Srivaastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to transfer - four
criminal cases pending in Meerut; four criminal cases pending in Hapur and,
one pending in Baghpat, all to the district Ghaziabad such that all criminal
cases sought to be transferred may be tried at one court at Ghaziabad where
four other criminal cases are pending against the applicant. The details of
such cases pending at Meerut, Hapur, Baghpat and Ghaziabad are as below:
MEERUT
Case No.
Crime No.
Section
Police
Station
District
Pending in the
court of
20672/21
463/16
193, 402 IPC
Kharkhauda
Meerut
ACJM, court
no.5, Meerut
20671/21
464/16
193, 402 IPC
Kharkhauda
Meerut
ACJM, court
no.5, Meerut
20665/21
465/16
193, 402 IPC
Kharkhauda
Meerut
ACJM, court
no.5, Meerut
20674/21
466/16
193, 402 IPC
Kharkhauda
Meerut
ACJM, court
no.5, Meerut
HAPUR
UPHP040011
652022
559/16
193, 420, 120-
B IPC
Plakhuwa
Hapur
CJM Hapur
UPHP04018
1632021
807/16
193, 419, 420
IPC
Plakhuwa
Hapur
CJM Hapur
UPHP04018
1602021
192/16
193, 419, 420
IPC
Plakhuwa
Hapur
Judicial
Magistrate II,
Hapur
UPHP04018
1612021
193/16
193, 419, 420
IPC
Plakhuwa
Hapur
Judicial
Magistrate II,
Hapur
BAGHPAT
UPBG04013
4002021
860/16
193, 420, 120-
B IPC
Baghpat
Baghpat
CJM Baghpat
GHAZIABAD
1978/22
571/16
193, 419, 420,
120-B IPC
Masuri
Ghaziabad ACJ(SD)/ACJM,
Court no.1,
Ghaziabad
7990/21
1605/16
193, 420 IPC
Sihani Gate Ghaziabad
ACJM, Court
no.3, Ghaziabad
9288/21
572/16
193, 419, 420,
120-B IPC
Masuri
Ghaziabad
ACJ(SD)/First
ACJM,
Ghaziabad
9287/21
779/16
193, 420 IPC
Masuri
Ghaziabad
ACJ(SD)/ First
ACJM,
Ghaziabad
3. Submission is, pursuant to certain directions issued by the division bench
of this Court sitting at Lucknow dated 7.10.2015, a Special Investigation
Team was constituted to examine the issue of bogus claims instituted before
M.A.C.T. and Workmen Compensation Commissioner, all pending at
Ghaziabad. In that, it appears, the Investigating Officer – Virendra Tiwari
(now retired) lodged 15 FIRs. Though all cases were found pending within
the jurisdiction of the court at Ghaziabad, first informant chose to lodge
individual FIRs in individual cases in the individual districts where the cause
of action to lodge the money claim may have arisen.
4. In such fact, learned counsel for applicant would submit, gross
miscarriage of justice may arise if the applicant, who is a practising lawyer,
is forced to participate in different trials in different districts.
5. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it has been prayed, all trials may be
transferred to the courts at Ghaziabad as may allow the applicant to further
pray to the learned District Judge, Ghaziabad, to ensure that all the trials are
conducted in one Court. Reliance has been placed on the provisions of
Section 220 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the
Cr.P.C.) and the decision of the Supreme Court Court in Satinder Singh
Bhasin vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., Writ Petition (S)
(Criminal) No.(s) 197/2021, decided on 12.5.2022.
2
6. On the other hand, learned AGA would submit, there is no power in the
Cr.P.C. as may allow such transfer of the proceedings, except in accordance
with Section 407 Cr.P.C.. That power has yet not been invoked. He would
assert, such applications would have to be filed in individual cases before the
appropriate forum. The inherent jurisdiction of the Court may not be
invoked and it may not be exercised in face of statutory provisions existing
with the nature of relief claimed. With reference to Section 220 Cr.P.C, it has
been submitted