Court No. - 66

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29954 of 2022

Applicant :- Somdutt And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- S.P.S. Chauhan,Smt. Meenakshi

Chauhan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vimlendu Tripathi

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.

1. Heard Mr. S. P.S. Chauhan, the learned counsel for

applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Vimlendu

Tripathi, the learned counsel for first informant/opposite party-

2.

2. Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to

the Cognizance taking Order /Summoning Order dated

20.08.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magisrate,

Jhansi in Criminal Misc. Case No. 92/12 of 2021 (Hariom Vs.

Somdutt and others) arising out of case crime no. 672 of 2020

under Sections 352, 324,504, 506, 307 IPC, Police Station -

Tappal , District -Aligarh, whereby court below has rejected the

police report dated 09.03.2021 submitted under Section 173 (2)

Cr.P.C. (final report), allowed the protest petition filed by first

informant opposite party-2 and simultaneously took cognizance

in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C.

3. Record shows that first in