SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
HARI SHARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


1

RESERVED

Court No. -92

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5156 of 2022

Petitioner :- Hari Sharan Singh And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Kunal Ravi Singh,Manjari Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhishek Sharma,Rajiv Sharma

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

1.

Heard Sri Rahul Jain, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kunal Ravi

Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Rajeev Sharma and Sri

Abhishek Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4, learned

Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and perused the record.

2.

This Misc. Civil Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution

of India has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of order dated

13.5.2022 passed by District Judge, Mirzapur in Misc. Case No.02 of

2017 (Hari Sharan Singh and another Vs. State of U.P. and others).

3.

The brief facts of the case are that one temple of Thakur Ji was

constructed by Dhaneshwari and Bageshwari sons of Devraj and deity

Thakur Laxmi Narain Ji was installed therein. Dhaneshwari and

Bageshwari both were unmarried. They donated their agricultural land

situated in Village Bairaini Kewtabeer and Semari, Pargana Kasiwar

Taluka Ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top