SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 28977

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMAGYA TIWARI AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24176 of 2022

Petitioner :- Ramagya Tiwari And 3 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Rao,Krishna Mohan Tripathi

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Munna Tiwari,Sudhir Bharti

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

Heard Mr. K.M. Tripathi, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Munna Tiwari for

respondent Nos. 6 and 7, Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, learned Additional

Advocate General assisted by Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional

Chief Standing Counsel for State-respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 and Mr.

Sudhir Bharti for respondent No5.

The instant petition has been filed for mandamus commanding the Sub-

District Magistrate, Tehsil-Tamkuhiraj, District-Kushinagar to summon the

record of the proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code,

2006 and consolidate the same along with the proceedings under

Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and decide both the

proceedings together. It is further prayed that respondents be restrained

from demolishing the residential house of the petitioners during

pendency of the aforementioned proceeding.

Brief facts of the case are that petitioners are i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top