2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 30954
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ANKIT ALIAS BANTI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/49522/2022
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49522 of
2022
Applicant :- Ankit Alias Banti
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Ojha,Satyam Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Yogesh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Giri, holding brief of Sri Mithilesh Kumar
Ojha, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State
and Sri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant
and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Ankit alias
Banti involved in case crime no.176 of 2022 under Sections 386,
354 Ka, 354 Gha, 504, 506 IPC and Section 66D, 66E, 67A
Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000, Police Station
Modinagar, District Ghaziabad.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present
case. He has not committed the present offence. Alleged offences
are not made out against the applicant. There is no credible
evidence against the applicant to connect him with the present
offence. Applicant never made any forged e-mail id to commit
forgery or to blackmail the victim nor any threat or extortion was
made through the alleged e-mail id. Applicant has no criminal
antecedents He has been languishing in jail since 14.10.2022 and
in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail
and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for
the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and
submitted that the applicant stolen the photographs and data from
the mobile phone of the informant, made obscene / objectionable
videos of the informant, threatened her and extorted money by
blackmailing her, which is apparent from the whatsapp and
facebook chats as well as bank statement of the informant.
In this matter, it reveals from the perusal of the record that the
victim is the sister of the brother-in-law (behnoi) of the applicant,
who alongwith other co-accused persons anyhow obtained the
mobile number, photographs and other data of the friends and
colleagues of the informant and started chasing her physically and
online and used to make obscene chats, abusing in filthy language,
threatening to defame her in the society and also to kidnap her and
his brother for murder and he also made fake ID in order to
blackmail the informant by making some obscene videos and to
make it viral and he also extorted Rs.2,34,020/- as extortion
money. The applicant alongwith co-accused hacked the facebook
and G-mail account of the informant and committed data theft
also. He always tried to take the updates of the informant and
threatened her for not picking her phone. The applicant also sent
messages on her mobile phone to make illicit relations with him,
which was protested by the informant. He again threatened her to
make her obscene video viral and also for her kidnapping and
murder. When the informant went to Netherlands after her
marriage, applicant again threatened her on her new mobile phone
by messaging and by whatsapp call and demanded Rs.5 lakh as
extortion money and again threatened to make her obscene videos
viral and also to sell that video in the black market. The informant
informed all the incidents to her husband and family members and
after checking, all the phone numbers were found to be of the
present applicant and his family members. His father Dinesh
Balian, on complaint, also took no action, but asked the informant
to send Rs.2 lakh as extortion money in the bank account of the
applicant. After lodging of the F.I.R., the investigation started and
sufficient evidence has been collected against the accused-
applicant so far, as it appears from the perusal of the case diary,
which is available before the Court. The informant / victim is a
married lady and is in close relation with the presen