SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DEEPESH SETHIYA AND 7 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 89

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4685 of 2022

Revisionist :- Deepesh Sethiya And 7 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Kishor Gupta,Shiv Shankar

Gupta

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned counsel for

the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State and

perused the record.

This criminal revision is directed against impugned order dated

26.09.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court

No. 3, Jhansi in Session Trial No.683 of 2021 (State versus

Deepesh Sethiya and others) arising out of Case Crime No.279

of 2021 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504 I.P.C. and

7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Mauranipur,

District Jhansi.

By the impugned order, learned sessions judge has rejected the

discharge application moved by the revisionists-accused.

F.I.R. of this case has been lodged by opposite party no.2 on

14.06.2021 at 04.58 hours. The allegations of the F.I.R. are that

on 13.06.2021 at about 9.00 p.m., Mukesh Agrawal, the uncle

of first informant was sitting on Chabutara in front of his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top