ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. RAMLALI URF MAYAWATI AND 6 ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
A482/41888/2018
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SECTION 482 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS - SUMMONING ORDER - APPLICANT NO.2 ALREADY RELEASED ON BAIL - APPLICANT NOS.1 AND 3 TO 7 DIRECTED TO SURRENDER AND APPLY FOR BAIL - BAIL APPLICATIONS TO BE DECIDED WITHIN 7 DAYS - DISCHARGE APPLICATIONS TO BE DECIDED WITHIN 6 WEEKS - GUIDELINES FOR SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF CASES TO BE FOLLOWED
Fact of the Case:
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings of a case against them for offences under Sections 498A, 304B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant no.2 had already been released on bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the applicants nos.1 and 3 to 7 to surrender and apply for bail, which was to be decided within 7 days. The court also directed that if the applicants were released on bail, they could file discharge applications, which were to be decided within 6 weeks. The court further directed that the guidelines for speedy disposal of cases, as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Hussain and another v. Union of India, were to be followed.
Issues: Whether the proceedings against the applicants should be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the proceedings against the applicants could not be quashed as the applicant no.2 had already been released on bail and the applicants nos.1 and 3 to 7 had not yet surrendered and applied for bail. The court also held that the guidelines for speedy disposal of cases, as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Hussain and another v. Union of India, were to be followed.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the application with the directions that the applicants nos.1 and 3 to 7 should surrender and apply for bail, which was to be decided within 7 days. The court also directed that if the applicants were released on bail, they could file discharge applications, which were to be decided within 6 weeks.
Court No. - 67
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41888 of 2018
Applicant :- Smt. Ramlali Urf Mayawati And 6 Ors
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Singh,Ranjeet Singh,Sanjeev Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the complainant as
well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
By means of the present 482 Cr.P.C. application, the prayer sought by the
applicants is to quash the proceeding of Case No.1368 of 2010 (Rooplal Vs.
Smt. Ramlali and ors.) arising out of case crime no.709 of 2009 under sections
498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police station-Sirsaganj, District-
Firozabad and summoning order dated 19.12.2017 in the court of Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Firozabad.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant no.2 has already
been bailed out.
Under the circumstances, the applicant no.2, if so advised, may invoke proper
remedy moving discharge application under section 227/239 Cr.P.C. and the
same shall be heard and decided by the learned court concerned within a period
of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by a
well reasoned order strictly in accordance with law.
So far as applicant nos.1 and 3 to 7 are concerned, considering the entire facts
and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced, this Court is of the
opinion that since learned counsel for the applicants has already given up that he
does not want to press the case on merit, in the fitness of circumstances, this 482
Cr.P.C. application stands disposed of with the direction that the court below
would extend the benefit of interim bail (if the court concerned deems it fit
according to the merit of each case) as contemplated in the law laid down by this
Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004
(57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in
2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. after
the applicants surrender within 30 days before the court and if their bail
applications are filed, the same shall be adjudicated and decided by the courts
below with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, in the
light of the judgment given by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hussain and
another Vs. Union of India reported in (2017) 5 SCC Page-702, relevant
extract of which reads as under :-
"….......Judicial service as well as legal service are not like any other services. They are
missions for serving the society. The mission is not achieved if the litigant who is waiting in
the queue does not get his turn for a long time"....... "Decision of cases of under-trials in
custody is one of the priority areas. There are obstructions at every level in enforcement of
right of speedy trial; vested interests or unscrupulous elements try to delay the
proceedings"....... "In spite of all odds, determined efforts are required at every level for
success of the mission"..... "The Presiding Officer of a court cannot rest in a state of
helplessness. This is the constitutional responsibility of the State to provide necessary
infrastructure and of the High Courts to monitor the functioning of subordinate courts to
ensure timely disposal of cases."
To satiate speedy disposal of the cases, the courts below are issued following
directions in accordance with the observations made in the case of Hussain and
another (Supra):
(i)Bail applications be disposed of normally within one week :
(ii) Magisterial trials, where accused are in custody, be normally concluded within six months
and sessions trials where accused are in custody be normally concluded within two years.
(iii).......................................................................................................;
(iv).................................................................................
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.