ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHD. ARIF AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22176 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mohd. Arif And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Petitioners before this Court seek benefit of judgment passed
by Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal Defective
No. 343 of 2021 (Abhishek Srivastava and others vs. State of
U.P. and others), decided on 25.08.2021 (affirmed upto
Supreme Court), however, said judgment put a caveat in
following words:
"The exercise aforesaid would not effect in any manner the selection of
appointments already made. The benefit would be given to the appellants
and the writ petitioners, if they are short of one mark and not otherwise. If
any of the litigant till date are short by two marks in the merit, they would
not be entitled to any benefit of this judgment."
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submit that petitioners have
filed separate representations through speed post, therefore,
they are also entitled for benefit of Abhishek Srivastava (supra).
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-Respondents,
submits
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.