SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GHANSHYAM AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 68

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36436 of 2022

Applicant :- Ghanshyam And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Pandey,Jyoti Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the

State and perused the material available on record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by

applicants to quash the entire criminal proceeding of in

complaint case no. 74 of 2018 (Rampreet Versus Ghanshyam

and Another) pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate

Pharenda, Maharajganj in pursuance of the impugned order

dated 19.03.2019.

During arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has

submitted that he does not want to press the prayer for quashing

of the above mentioned case. His sole prayer is that a direction

may be issued to the court below to decide the bail application

of the applicants in view of the judgment in the case Satender

Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and

another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present

application is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top