SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 22033

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MANJU BANSAL AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


1

AFR

Court No. - 92

Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 286 of

2022

Applicant :- Manju Bansal And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Prateek Kumar Srivastava,Ritukar

Gupta,Sr. Advocate

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raj Kumar Kesari

Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.

1. Heard Sri V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted

by Sri Ritukar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, learned

A.G.A. for the State as well as Sri Raj Kumar Kesari, learned

counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

2. The present application has been moved by the accused-

applicant Sahib Bansal (husband) under Section 407 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking transfer of entire

proceedings of Sessions Trial No.19 of 2020 (State Vs. Manju

Bansal and others), arising out of Case Crime No.567 of 2018,

under Sections 498A, 504, 506, 307, 120B I.P.C. and Section

3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Pilakhuva, District

Hapur, pending in the court of Additional District & Sessions

Judge/Fast Track Court, Court No.1, Hapur to any other court of

competent jurisdiction of another District.

3. Succinctly, the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top