SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 28402

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ADBUL RAKEEB AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 88

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4546 of 2022

Revisionist :- Adbul Rakeeb And Another

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Dheeraj Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A

for the State.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the

order dated 08.08.2022, passed by the learned Additional

District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO) Court No.1,

Muzaffar Nagar in S.T. No. 461 of 2022, whereby the

application filed by the revisionists/accused under Section 227

Cr.P.C. for discharge has been rejected.

3. At the outset learned counsel for the revisionists submitted

that he does not want to press the instant criminal revision on

behalf of revisionist no.2 Abdul Shami.

4. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision on behalf of

revisionist No. 2 Abdul Shami, is dismissed as not pressed.

5. So far the revisionist No.1 Abdul Rakeeb is concerned,

learned counsel for the revisionist argued that the impugned

order is against facts and law and thus, liable to be set aside.

The revisionist no.1 Abd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top