ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ADBUL RAKEEB AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4546 of 2022
Revisionist :- Adbul Rakeeb And Another
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Dheeraj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A
for the State.
2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the
order dated 08.08.2022, passed by the learned Additional
District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO) Court No.1,
Muzaffar Nagar in S.T. No. 461 of 2022, whereby the
application filed by the revisionists/accused under Section 227
Cr.P.C. for discharge has been rejected.
3. At the outset learned counsel for the revisionists submitted
that he does not want to press the instant criminal revision on
behalf of revisionist no.2 Abdul Shami.
4. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision on behalf of
revisionist No. 2 Abdul Shami, is dismissed as not pressed.
5. So far the revisionist No.1 Abdul Rakeeb is concerned,
learned counsel for the revisionist argued that the impugned
order is against facts and law and thus, liable to be set aside.
The revisionist no.1 Abd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.