ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RURAL TECHNOLOGY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
WRIC/34869/2022
EPF - REVIEW - [SECTION 7-B(5)] - An order passed under Section 7-B(5) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, rejecting an application for review, is not appealable under Section 7-I of the Act. However, the original order passed under Section 7-A of the Act, which has not been reopened by granting the review, can be challenged by way of an appeal under Section 7-I.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an educational institution, challenged an order passed under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act), and a subsequent order rejecting its review petition under Section 7-B of the Act. The petitioner argued that the review order was not appealable under Section 7-I of the Act and that the writ petition was maintainable.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the order rejecting the review petition was not appealable under Section 7-I of the EPF Act. However, the Court found that the review petition was rightly rejected as it did not satisfy any of the conditions for entertaining a review under Section 7-B of the Act.
Issues: 1. Whether an order passed under Section 7-B(5) of the EPF Act, rejecting an application for review, is appealable under Section 7-I of the Act?2. Whether the review petition in the present case was rightly rejected?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. An order passed under Section 7-B(5) of the EPF Act, rejecting an application for review, is not appealable under Section 7-I of the Act.2. A review petition under Section 7-B of the EPF Act can only be entertained if it satisfies one of the following conditions: - Discovery of new and important matter or evidence - Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record - Any other sufficient reason
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the original order passed under Section 7-A of the EPF Act by filing an appeal under Section 7-I of the Act.
Reserved on 02.01.2023
Delivered on 06.01.2023
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34869 of 2022
Petitioner :- Institute Of Engineering And Rural Technology
Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Singh,Sr. Advocate
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Jagdish Pathak,Mukteshwar Upadhyay
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1.
Factual matrix of present case, in brief, are that petitioner has suffered
with an order dated 18.10.2021 passed under Section 7-A of Employees’
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter
referred to as “Act, 1952”). Being aggrieved petitioner filed a review
petition under Section 7-B of Act, 1952 which was dismissed vide order
dated 22.09.2022. Both the above referred orders are under challenge before
this Court.
2.
At the outset, Sri Mukteshwar Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing
for Respondent-1, raised a preliminary objection that any order passed under
Section 7-A of Act, 1952 is appealable under Section 7-I of Act, 1952 as
well as the order passed in review petition is an order under Section 7-B(5),
therefore, it is also appealable under Section 7-I of Act, 1952 and the present
writ petition is not maintainable due to statutory alternative remedy available
to petitioner.
3.
Sri Amrendra Nath Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri
Ajay Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, fairly submitted that any order
passed under Section 7-A of Act, 1952 is appealable under Section 7-I of
Act, however, every order passed under Section 7-B(5) is not appealable
under Section 7-I. He referred both the provisions and for reference Section
7-B and 7-I of Act, 1952 are reproduced hereinafter:
“7-B. Review of orders passed under section 7-A.—(1) Any person
aggrieved by an order made under sub-section (1) of section 7-A,
2
but from which no appeal has been preferred under this Act, and
who, from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence
which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within his
knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the
order was made, or on account of some mistake or error apparent on
the face of the record or for any other sufficient reason, desires to
obtain a review of such order may apply for a review of that order to
the officer who passed the order:
Provided that such officer may also on his own motion
review his order if he is satisfied that it is necessary so to do on any
such ground.
(2) Every application for review under sub-section (1) shall be filed
in such form and manner and within such time as may be specified
in the Scheme.
(3) Where it appears to the officer receiving an application for
review that there is no sufficient ground for a review, he shall reject
the application.
(4) Where the officer is of opinion that the application for review
should be granted, he shall grant the same:
Provided that,—
(a) no such application shall be granted without previous notice to
all the parties before him to enable them to appear and be heard in
support of the order in respect of which a review is applied for, and
(b) no such application shall be granted on the ground of discovery
of new matter or evidence which the applicant alleges was not
within his knowledge or could not be produced by him when the
order was made, without proof of such allegation.
(5) No appeal shall lie against the order of the officer rejecting an
application for review, but an appeal under this Act shall lie against
an order passed under review as if the order passed under review
were the original order passed by him under section 7-A.”
3
“7-I. Appeals to Tribunal.—(1) Any person aggrieved by a
notification issued by the Central Government, or an order passed by
the Central Government or any authority, under the proviso to sub-
section (3), or sub-section (4), of section 1, or section 3, or sub-
section (1) of section 7-A, or section 7-B except an order rejecting
an application f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.