SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 24075

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RIYAZUDDDIN AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 88

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4904 of 2022

Revisionist :- Riyazudddin And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Atul Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A

for the State.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the

order dated 01.11.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge,

Pilibhit in Session Trial No. 1263/2022, (Case Crime No.

420/2021), State Vs. Riyazuddin and 3 Others, under Sections

504, 323 I.P.C., Police Station Puranpur, District Pilibhit,

whereby the application filed by the accused-revisionists under

Section 227 Cr.P.C. for discharge of offence under Section 308

IPC has been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that the

impugned order is against facts and law and thus, liable to be

set aside. The first information report of this case was lodged

under Sections 504, 323 I.P.C. making false and baseless

allegations. It was pointed out that in x-ray report of injured Ata

Mohammad, no bony injury was shown but later on the injured

obtained a CT Scan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top