2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 25328
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURENDRA KOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE THRU C.B.I. – Respondent
CAPT 5183 2017
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199091-DB
Reserved
Index
In
Nithari Judgement
CAPITAL CASE No. - 5183 of 2017
With
CAPITAL REFERENCE No. 10 of 2017
Surendra Koli ……..Appellant
Versus
State through Central Bureau of Investigation …….Respondent
With
CAPITAL CASE No. - 4404 of 2017
With
CAPITAL REFERENCE No. 10 of 2017
Moninder Singh Pandher ....Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation and another …….Respondent
Sl. No.
Particulars
Page No.
1.
The Nithari incident (Para 3-15)
6-12
2.
Disappearance of victim A (Para 16-19)
13-14
3.
Documentary evidence of prosecution (Para-20)
14-22
4.
4a.
Oral evidence of prosecution (Para 21)
Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. (Para 22-23)
23-26
26-27
5.
Defence Evidence (Para 24-25)
27-28
6.
Chronology of events (Para 26)
28-40
7.
Issues framed during trial u/s 354(1)(b) Cr.P.C.
(Para 27-28)
40-41
8.
Circumstances relied upon by the court of
Sessions to hold the accused guilty (Para 29)
41-42
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Arguments in support of appeal (Para 30-73)
Arguments on behalf of the prosecution (CBI)
(Para 74-83)
Issues arising in the appeal (Para 84-87)
Law on recovery u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence
Act, 1872. (Para 88-96)
Analysis of evidence on the aspect of arrest of
accused, disclosure by him and the recovery
(Para 97-150)
42-59
59-65
65-66
66-75
75-96
2
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Evidence of previous recovery of biological
material from the same spot (Para 151-161)
Circumstance of accused SK luring girls and
cutting body parts before experts at AIIMS (para
153-161)
Circumstances leading to confession of accused
(Para 162-181)
Contents of transcription of recorded confession
(Para 182)
Retraction of confession by the accused (Para
183-186)
Law on confession:-
(i) Confession is viewed with circumspection
(Para 187-198);
(ii) Confession has to be read as a whole (Para
199-200);
(iii) If tainted in part, the taint attaches to each
part of the confession (Para 201-202)
(iv) Confession must be voluntary and true (Para
203-204);
(v) Burden to prove that confession is voluntary
is on the prosecution (Para 205-206);
(vi) Role/duty of court in recording confession
(Para 207-209)
Analysis of evidence on the aspect of confession
to ascertain Voluntariness and truthfulness:-
•
Prolonged police custody (Para 211-221);
•
Delayed confession to facilitate tutoring?
(Para 222-224);
•
Torture to accused (Para 225-234);
•
Confession letter to ACMM New Delhi (Para
235-237);
•
No proper medical examination of accused
SK (Para 238-241);
•
Prosecution stand on torture (Para 242);
•
Evidence on torture (Para 243-248);
•
Confession in view of Section 28 of the
Evidence Act (Para 249-250);
•
Facets of confession in this case (Para 251-
267);
•
Safeguards under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Para
268-274);
•
No effective legal aid (Para 275-280);
•
Non compliance of procedural safeguards
under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Para 281-288);
96-97
97-100
100-112
112-140
140-145
146-157
157-160
160-161
162-164
164-168
168-169
170
170-178
178-179
179-183
183-184
184-185
185-186
186-187
187-188
188-195
195-197
197-200
200-203
3
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
•
No conclusive finding of voluntariness prior
to recording of confession (Para 289-290);
•
Confession not properly proved (Para 291-
297);
•
Confession not shown to be true, rather,
contradicted by other evidence? (Para 298-
299);
•
No independent corroboration of murder,
rape or cannibalism (Para 300-309);
•
Events mentioned in confession improbable
(Para 310-318);
Scientific
evidence
relied
upon
by
prosecution(Para 319-339)
Impact of previous judgment in the case of
'XYZ' :- (Para 340-408)
(i) Supreme Court in 'XYZ' only affirmed the
findings, conclusion and sentence of the High
Court in respect of accused SK; (Para 340-341)
(ii) High Court restricted its findings only to the
case of '