2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 28576
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURENDRA KOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
CAPT 196 2018
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199091-DB
Reserved
Index
In
Nithari Judgement
CAPITAL CASE No. - 196 of 2018
With
CAPITAL REFERENCE No. 1 of 2018
Surendra Koli ……..Appellant
Versus
State through Central Bureau of Investigation …….Respondent
AND
CAPITAL CASE No. - 197 of 2018
With
CAPITAL REFERENCE No. 1 of 2018
Moninder Singh Pandher ....Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation and another …….Respondent
Sl. No.
Particulars
Page No.
1.
The Nithari incident (Para 4-13)
6-12
2.
Disappearance of victim ‘C’ (Para 16-22)
13-15
3.
Documentary evidence of prosecution (Para-23)
15-22
4.
4a.
Oral evidence of prosecution (Para 24)
Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. (Para 25-26)
22-24
24-25
5.
Defence Evidence (Para 27)
26
6.
Chronology of events (Para 28)
26-37
7.
Issues framed during trial u/s 354(1)(b) Cr.P.C.
(Para 29-30)
37-38
8.
Circumstances relied upon by the court of
Sessions to hold the accused guilty (Para 31)
38
9.
10.
Arguments in support of appeal (Para 32-69)
Arguments on behalf of the prosecution (CBI)
(Para 70-75)
39-54
54-56
2
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Issues arising in the appeal (Para 76-78)
Law on recovery u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence
Act, 1872. (Para 79-87)
Analysis of evidence on the aspect of arrest of
accused, disclosure by him and the recovery
(Para 88-125)
Evidence of previous recovery of biological
material from the same spot (Para 126-127)
Circumstance of accused SK luring girls and
cutting body parts before experts at AIIMS (para
128-136)
Circumstances leading to confession of accused
(Para 137-156)
Contents of transcription of recorded confession
(Para 157)
Retraction of confession by the accused (Para
158-161)
Law on confession:-
(i) Confession is viewed with circumspection
(Para 162-173);
(ii) Confession has to be read as a whole (Para
174-175);
(iii) If tainted in part, the taint attaches to each
part of the confession (Para 176-177)
(iv) Confession must be voluntary and true (Para
178-179);
(v) Burden to prove that confession is voluntary
is on the prosecution (Para 180);
(vi) Role/duty of court in recording confession
(Para 181-183)
Analysis of evidence on the aspect of confession
to ascertain Voluntariness and truthfulness:-
•
Prolonged police custody (Para 185-195);
•
Delayed confession to facilitate tutoring?
(Para 196-198);
•
Torture to accused (Para -199-208);
•
Confession letter to ACMM New Delhi (Para
209-211);
•
No proper medical examination of accused
SK (Para 212-215);
•
Prosecution stand on torture (Para 216);
•
Evidence on torture (Para 217-222);
•
Confession in view of Section 28 of the
Evidence Act (Para 223-224);
•
Facets of confession in this case (Para 225-
56-57
57-68
68-82
82-83
83-86
87-99
99-125
125-130
130-140
140-143
143-144
144-146
146-148
148-149
149-158
158-159
159-163
164-165
165-166
166
166-167
168
168-175
3
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
241);
•
Safeguards under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Para
242-248);
•
No effective legal aid (Para 249-254);
•
Non compliance of procedural safeguards
under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Para 255-261);
•
No conclusive finding of voluntariness prior
to recording of confession (Para 262-263);
•
Confession not properly proved (Para 264-
270);
•
Confession not shown to be true, rather,
contradicted by other evidence? (Para
271);
•
No independent corroboration of murder,
rape or cannibalism (Para 272-281);
•
Events mentioned in confession improbable
(Para 282-290);
Impact of previous judgment in the case of
'XYZ' :- (Para 291-310)
(i) Supreme Court in 'XYZ' only affirmed the
findings, conclusion and sentence of the High
Court in respect of accused SK;
(ii) High Court restricted its findings only to the
case of 'XYZ' and were not to apply in other
cases of Nithari killings, including this case;
(iii) Evidence in the case of 'XYZ' di