SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
PREM CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 46

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19410 of

2022

Petitioner :- Prem Chandra Pandey

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.

Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

A.G.A. for the State-respondents.

The present petition has been filed seeking direction to the

respondent authorities to conclude the fair investigation of Case

Crime No. 179 of 2022, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 302, 337

I.P.C., Police Station- Shadiyabad, District Ghazipur.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the

police is acting in collusion with the accused persons and as yet

neither the accused persons have been arrested nor any charge

sheet has been filed against the accused persons.

Admittedly, petitioner is aggrieved by the manner of

investigation said to have been conducted against private

respondents.

The apex court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v.

Hemant Yashwant Dhage, (2016) 6 SCC 277, following its

earlier decision in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., (2008) 2 SCC

409, held as fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top