2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 25416
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GAJENDRA KUMAR
AQUEEL @ AQUEEL ABBAS RIZVI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/4051/2023
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4051
of 2023
Applicant :- Aqueel @ Aqueel Abbas Rizvi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rehan Waris
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and
perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that
identically placed co-accused Sahab Urf Mohd. Ahmad has
been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide order
dated 17.10.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.
39511 of 2022. He further submits that since the role of the
applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused,
therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of
parity. It is next submitted that the applicant is innocent and has
been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in
jail since 10.06.2022.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity
of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the
parties, the fact that co-accused has already been released on
bail by this Court and without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has
made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Aqueel @ Aqueel Abbas Rizvi involved in
Case Crime No. 175 of 2022, under Sections 143, 144, 145,
147, 148, 149, 153-B, 307, 332, 336, 353, 435, 427, 504, 506,
505(2), 120-B IPC and 3/4 Explosive Substances Act and
Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 83(2) of
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act and Section 3/4 of
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, P.S. Kareli,
District Prayagraj be released on bail on his furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following
conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties
be verified.
(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the
trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution
witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date
fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the
offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission
of which he is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or temper with the
evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the
prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation
application before this Court.
Order Date :- 28.1.2023
Sanjeet
Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad