ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI URF BABY – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/53782/2022
Fact of the Case:
The applicant, Vinod Kumar Dwivedi, was arrested and charged with various offenses, including impersonation, forgery, and cheating. He filed a bail application, arguing that he was falsely implicated and had no criminal history.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had been in jail since October 21, 2022, and that there was no evidence to suggest that he would misuse his liberty if released on bail.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to be released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to be released on bail because he had no criminal history, had been in jail for a significant period of time, and there was no evidence to suggest that he would misuse his liberty if released on bail.
Final Decision: The court granted the applicant's bail application and ordered his release on bail subject to certain conditions.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53782
of 2022
Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Dwivedi Urf Baby
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Bhanu Pratap Singh,Ashok Kumar
Tiwari,Sr. Advocate
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar
Dubey,Satyendra Narayan Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Amrendra Nath Singh, learned Senior Counsel
assisted by Sri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the
applicant, Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the
informant and Sri Vikas Sahai, learned AGA for the State-
opposite party.
The instant bail application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., has been
filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case
Crime No. 486 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471,
406, 506, 120B I.P.C., Police Station- Gulariha, District-
Gorakhpur during the pendency of trial.
It is contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in
the instant case. No amount has been credited in the account of
the applicant. The applicant is not a beneficiary of any illicit
transaction. It is further contended that the applicant did not
impersonate as the owner of the property in dispute nor did he
introduced the co-accused persons to the informant. The case of
the applicant is clearly distinguishable from that of other co-
accused persons. The applicant has no criminal history and he is
in jail since 21.10.2022 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he
will not misuse the said liberty.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not
satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.
Having regard to the submissions made but without
commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the
applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
Let the applicant- Vinod Kumar Dwivedi Urf Baby involved
in aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that
he:
(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;
(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the
prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation
application before this Court.
Order Date :- 11.1.2023
Aditya
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.