SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GAURAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 68

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41395 of 2022

Applicant :- Gaurav

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State and

perused the record.

By means of this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant has prayed for

quashing of the N.B.W. dated 4.3.2021 passed by learned court of Addl.

District Judge, Court No. 3, Bijnor in Session Trial No. 1049 of 2020

(Gaurav and another Vs State of UP), arising out of Case Crime No. 238

of 2020, under Section 5.25 of Arms Act, P.S. Mandawar, District Bijnor.

After arguing for while, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to

press the relief sought in the application. He submits that the non bailable

warrant has been issued against the applicant by the trial Court and the

applicant is ready to appear before the trial court and direction may be

given to the court below to consider the bail application of the applicant in

view of the judgment in the case Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central

Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

In the case of Saten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top