ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJAT SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19497 of 2022
Petitioner :- Rajat Saxena
Respondent :- The State Of U P And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Javed Raza
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Petitioner before this Court seeks benefit of judgment passed by Division
Bench of this Court in Special Appeal Defective No. 343 of 2021 (Abhishek
Srivastava and others vs. State of U.P. and others), decided on 25.08.2021
(affirmed upto Supreme Court), however, said judgment put a caveat in
following words:
"The exercise aforesaid would not effect in any manner the selection
of appointments already made. The benefit would be given to the
appellants and the writ petitioners, if they are short of one mark and
not otherwise. If any of the litigant till date are short by two marks in
the merit, they would not be entitled to any benefit of this judgment."
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has filed a
representation dated 04.05.2020 by way of E-mail, therefore, he is also entitled
for benefit of Abhishek Srivastava (supra).
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-Respondents, submits that
benefit of Abhishek
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.