ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DINESH PATHAK
JAI SHRI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 68 of 2023
Petitioner :- Jai Shri
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing
counsel representing respondents No. 1 and 2 and perused
the record.
The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with a
prayer to restrain the Consolidation Officer to proceed
with the case No. 17 (Indrajeet Vs. State) under Rule 109A
of UP Consolidation of Holdings Rules (in short, 'UPCH
Rules') inasmuch as the order dated 15.12.1998 passed by
the Consolidation Officer, which has been sought to be
implemented in application under Rule 109A of the UPCH
Rules, has already been assailed in appeal before the
Settlement Officer of Consolidation, who has passed the
order dated 4.1.2022 staying the further proceedings of
application under Rule 109A of UPCH Rules.
Learned standing counsel has contended that the grievance
of the petitioner can more appropriately be redressed by
the Consolidation Officer concerned before whom
application under Rule 109A of the UPCH Rules is
pending considerati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.