2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 29851
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJ KUMAR TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ABAIL/11348/2022
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11348 of 2022
Applicant :- Raj Kumar Tyagi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Pal Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Yogendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the accused-
applicant and learned AGA and perused the record.
The present bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been
filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 734 of 2022
under Sections 384 & 506 IPC and Section 7 of Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station Hapur Nagar, District Hapur.
Sri Kamla Shankar Pathak, learned counsel for complainant
opposed the bail application.
This court vide order dated 14.12.2022 has granted interim
protection to the accused/applicant and there has been provided
that the accused/applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail till
submission of the police report, if any under Section 173(2)
Cr.P.C.
Charge-sheet is yet to be filed. The interim order dated 14.12.2022
is confirmed and it is provided that accused/applicant shall appear
before the trial court within a period of 10 days from today and
submit personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to
the satisfaction of the trial Court, if already not filed, on the
following conditions, which are imposed in the interest of justice,
and other conditions, which may be desirable by the learned trial
Court:-
(i) the applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that they
shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence
when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this
condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of
liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(ii). the applicant shall remain present before the trial court on
each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of
his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed
against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(iii). in case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order
to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is
issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the
date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate
proceedings against him in accordance with law, under Section
174-A of the Indian Penal Code; and
(iv) the applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial
court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of
charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If
in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is
deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the
trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and
proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 13.2.2023
Vijay
Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad