ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
M/S AAR KAY TEX AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
WRIC/39911/2022
SARFESI ACT - STAY OF PROCEEDINGS - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners had defaulted on a loan taken from the respondent bank, and proceedings under the SARFESI Act were initiated against them. The petitioners challenged the proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and filed an application for a stay of the proceedings. The DRT allowed the application for preponing the hearing but noted that the matter would be put up on the date already fixed.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that there was extreme urgency in the matter and that if the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act was implemented, the purpose of filing the stay application would be defeated.
Issues: Whether the DRT erred in not preponing the date for consideration of the stay application.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the DRT should have preponed the date for consideration of the stay application and disposed of the same within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order.
Final Decision: The court directed the DRT to prepone the date of hearing of the stay application and dispose of the same within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39911 of 2022
Petitioner :- M/S Aar Kay Tex And 2 Others
Respondent :- Uco Bank And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Chandani
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Ajay Shankar
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
The petitioners have called in question an order dated 9.12.2022
passed by respondent no.5 under Section 14 of the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFESI Act) and
for restraining the respondent-Bank from taking any coercive
measure in pursuance of the said order.
The petitioners are borrower and having defaulted in payment
of loan taken from respondent no.1, the proceedings under the
SARFESI Act are in progress.
The petitioners have challenged the proceedings by filing
Securitization Application No.296 of 2020 before the Debts
Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad. As impugned order under
Section 14 of SARFESI Act was passed during pendency of the
securitization application, the petitioners applied for stay before
DRT, Allahabad. The petitioners also filed an application for
preponing the date of hearing. The application filed by them for
preponing the hearing was allowed but surprisingly in the last
part of the order it is noted that the matter be put up on the date
already fixed i.e. 24.3.2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that there is extreme
urgency in the matter and in case, the order passed under
Section 14 of SARFESI Act is implemented, the very purpose
of filing stay application will stand defeated.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank is not in a position to
dispute the same. He also does not have any objection in case a
direction is issued to the DRT, Allahabad to prepone the date for
consideration of the stay application.
Accordingly, with the consent of counsel for the parties, the
petition is disposed of with direction to the DRT, Allahabad to
prepone the date of hearing of the stay application and dispose
of the same within 15 days from the date of receipt of true
attested copy of the instant order.
The parties have agreed that they will appear before the DRT,
Allahabad on 16.1.2023, so that a date is fixed within 15 days
by DRT, Allahabad for consideration and disposal of the stay
application.
Order Date :- 11.1.2023
Bhaskar
(Vikram D. Chauhan, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :-
BHASKAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.