ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BACHCHHRAJ PASI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/54566/2022
BAIL - ARMS ACT - SECTION 3/25 - APPLICANT INCARCERATED SINCE 17.4.2020 - OUT OF 19 CASES, ACQUITTED IN 6 AND ON BAIL IN REST - BAIL GRANTED
Fact of the Case:
Applicant sought bail in a case under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act, alleging false implication and no recovery of a country-made pistol and cartridge from his possession. He had been in jail since 17.4.2020 and had a criminal history of 19 cases, including 5 under the Goonda Act and Section 110 Cr.P.C., but had been acquitted in 6 cases and was on bail in the remaining cases.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted the applicant's long incarceration, acquittal in 6 out of 19 cases, and bail in the remaining cases. It considered the nature of the allegation and the period of incarceration and found it fit to grant bail.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering his criminal history and the nature of the allegation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that despite the applicant's criminal history, his long incarceration, acquittal in 6 cases, and bail in the remaining cases warranted his release on bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54566
of 2022
Applicant :- Bachchhraj Pasi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the
applicant and Sri Ravi Kant Kushwaha, learned AGA for the
State-respondent.
The instant application has been filed seeking release of the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 71 of 2020, under Sections
3/25 Arms Act, Police Station Dhata, District Fatehpur, during
pendency of the trial in the court below.
According to the FIR, applicant opened fire upon police and
from his possession one country-made pistol alongwith a live
cartridge were recovered.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has
falsely been implicated in the present matter and he neither
opened any fire upon police nor any country-made pistol and
cartridge were recovered from his possession. He further
submitted that applicant in the present matter is in jail since
17.4.2020. He further submitted that applicant has been made
accused in as many as 19 other cases, out of which, 5 cases
were of Goonda Act & section 110 Cr.P.C. and in 6 cases, he
has already been acquitted and in rest cases, he is on bail,
therefore, considering the nature of allegation and period of
incarceration in jail, applicant may be released on bail.
Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could
not dispute the fact that only allegation against the applicant is
that from his possession, one country made pistol and a live
cartridge were recovered and in the present matter, he is in jail
since 17.4.2020 and in all the 19 cases in which he was wanted
he is either on bail or he has already been acquitted.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record of the case.
The present matter relates to Section 3/25 Arms Act and
applicant is in jail since 17.4.2020. Although applicant is having
criminal history of 19 cases but considering the long
incarceration of the applicant in the present matter and the fact
that out of 19 cases in 6 cases, he has already been acquitted
and 5 cases belongs to section 110 Cr.P.C. and Gonda Act and
in rest of the cases, applicant is on bail, this Court is of the view
that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail.
In the light of discussions made above, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is
allowed.
Let the applicant-Bachchhraj Pasi be released on bail in the
aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties
each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates
fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the
evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-
social activity.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution
will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for
cancellation of the bail of the applicant.
Order Date :- 10.1.2023
Ankita
Digitally signed by :-
ANKITA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.