SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 26203

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KAMAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 84

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51083 of 2022

Applicant :- Kamal

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Prakash Singh,Raj Kiran Chaudhary

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

1. Heard Sri Raj Karan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the

applicant and Sri Amit Kumar Shukla, learned Brief Holder, for

the State.

2. The instant bail application has been moved on behalf of the

applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime

No.150 of 2022 under Section 8/22 NDPS Act, Police Station

GRP Cantt., District Varanasi during pendency of the trial.

3. According to the FIR, from the possession of applicant

110gm. of Alprazolam powder was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the entire

allegation against the applicant is totally false and baseless and

nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession.

He further submits that at the time of alleged recovery

mandatory provisions of Section 50 of NDPS Act have not been

complied with in its letter and spirit. He further urged that

although commercial quantity of Alprazolam powder is 100gm.

but from the possession

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top