ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PAPPU @ SHIV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/44403/2022
BAIL - 411, 413, 307, 504 IPC - Applicant accused of stealing 10 motorcycles and firing upon police - No injuries sustained by police - Applicant having criminal history - Bail granted considering the nature of allegations and time spent in jail.
Fact of the Case:
Applicant was arrested along with another co-accused for allegedly stealing 10 motorcycles and firing upon the police. The police recovered the stolen motorcycles from their possession, but none of the police personnel sustained any injuries. The applicant has a criminal history of 10 cases, but he has explained the same in his affidavit.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that although the applicant is accused of serious offenses, none of the police personnel sustained any injuries during the alleged encounter. The court also considered the applicant's criminal history and the fact that he has been in jail since 25.6.2022.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the nature of allegations and his criminal history.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail considering the nature and allegation made against him in the present matter and the fact that he is in jail since 25.6.2022.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44403 of 2022
Applicant :- Pappu @ Shiv Kumar
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Bahadur Shivhare
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Heard Sri Vijay Bahadur Shivhare, learned counsel for the
applicant and Dr. S.B.Maurya, learned AGA-I, for the State.
2. The instant application has been moved on behalf of the
applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime
No.77 of 2022, under Sections 411, 413, 307 and 504 IPC and
Section 41 Cr.P.C., Police Station Lalpura, District Hamirpur
during pendency of the trial.
3. According to the prosecution story applicant was
apprehended along with one another co-accused and from their
possession ten stolen motorcycle were recovered. According to
the FIR they also opened fire upon the Police but none
sustained any injury. It is further alleged in the FIR that one
accused person anyhow managed to escape.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant
has falsely been implicated in the present matter by local
Police and he is having no concern with the alleged stolen
motorcycle and in fact nothing incriminating has been
recovered from his possession, although it is a case of police
encounter but admittedly none of the Police Personnel
sustained any injury and on the basis of false recovery of
country made pistol and ten motorcycles, applicant and other
co-accused persons have falsely been implicated in the present
matter. He further submitted that although applicant is having
criminal history of ten cases but he has explained the same in
paragraph-10 to the affidavit filed in support of the present
application.
6. He next submitted that out of ten cases, two cases arose out
of same recovery memo and in all other cases applicant made
accused after arrest in the present matter and in the case relates
to Sections 302 and 120B IPC, he is not even being prosecuted.
He further submitted that applicant is in jail since 25.6.2022.
7. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the bail prayer for bail
and submits that from the possession of applicant as many as
ten stolen motor cycles were recovered but could not dispute
the fact that although he is having criminal history of ten cases
but out of ten cases, two cases arose from the recovery memo of
the present case and in all other cases, he has been implicated
after arrest in the present matter and in the present case he is in
jail since 25.6.2022.
8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record of the case.
9. Although there is allegation against the applicant that he
along with co-accused persons opened fire upon the police
personnel and from the possession of applicant and other co-
accused persons ten stolen motor cycles were recovered but
indisputably none of the police personnel sustained any injury
and it appears that after arrest applicant has been made accused
in number of other cases, therefore, considering the nature and
allegation made against him in the present matter and the fact
that he is in jail since 25.6.2022, in my view, applicant is
entitled to be released on bail.
10. In the light of discussions made above, without expressing
any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail
application is allowed.
11. Let the applicant-Pappu @ Shiv Kumar be released on bail
in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two
sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates
fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the
evide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.